Publicación:
La percepción ciudadana sobre la sostenibilidad del patrimonio mundial. El caso del centro histórico de Santa Ana de Cuenca

Página de artículo simple
dc.contributor.authorMolina, Bárbara
dc.contributor.corporatenameSello editorial Coruniamericana
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T20:01:07Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T20:01:07Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-16
dc.description.abstractLa incorporación del modelo sostenible en la gestión del Patrimonio Mundial, implica un enfoque participativo en la identificación, protección, conservación, presentación y transmisión de los valores universales excepcionales para las generaciones futuras. La ciudadanía, como actor social relevante, aporta una percepción del patrimonio que informa sobre cuestiones clave para lograr una gestión sostenible del mismo. La carencia de metodologías para comprender la relación entre la sociedad y el patrimonio desde el enfoque sostenible, sin embargo, supone una limitación para la participación de la ciudadanía en la gestión patrimonial. Este articulo proporciona evidencia empírica sobre el nivel de sostenibilidad que existe en el centro histórico Patrimonio Mundial de Cuenca (Ecuador), desde la percepción ciudadana. Los resultados estadísticos revelan que la sostenibilidad del patrimonio depende de una reputación que se construye en torno a múltiples fenómenos interconectados que determinan unos patrones actitudinales positivos o negativos. El articulo contribuye así? a la comprensión de la relación entre ciudadana y patrimonio, haciendo hincapié? en los aspectos que deben ser trabajados metodológicamente para lograr una gestión sostenible del centro histórico de Cuenca.spa
dc.description.abstractThe incorporation of the sustainable model in World Heritage Sites management implies a participatory approach in the identification, protection, conservation, presentation and transmission of the outstanding universal values (OUV) for future generations (UNESCO, 2017). Citizens, as relevant social actors, provide a reputation regarding cultural heritage that informs on key issues in order to achieve its sustainable management. The lack of methodologies to comprehend the relationship between society and cultural heritage from a sustainable approach is a limitation to achieve participatory management. This article provides empirical evidence on the level of sustainability that exists in the World Heritage site of Cuenca (Ecuador), from the citizen`s point of view. The statistical results reveal that its sustainability relies on a reputation that is built around multiple interconnected phenomena that determine positive or negative attitudinal patterns. The article thus contributes to the understanding of the relationship between citizenship and heritage, with emphasis on the aspects that must be addressed in order to achieve sustainable management in the historic center of Cuenca.eng
dc.format.extent16 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationMolina, . B. (2019). La percepción ciudadana sobre la sostenibilidad del patrimonio mundial. El caso del centro histórico de Santa Ana de Cuenca. Pensamiento Americano, 12(24), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.312
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.312
dc.identifier.eissn2745-1402
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universitaria Américana
dc.identifier.issn2027-2448
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.americana.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.americana.edu.co/handle/001/344
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherPensamiento Americano
dc.publisher.placeBarranquilla, Colombia
dc.relation.citationendpage95
dc.relation.citationissue24
dc.relation.citationstartpage79
dc.relation.citationvolume12
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPensamiento Americano
dc.relation.referencesAgapito, D., Mendes, J. & Valle, P. (2013). Exploring the conceptualization of the sensory dimension of tourist experiences. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2(2), 62-73.
dc.relation.referencesAuclair, E. & Fairclough, G. (2015). Theory and practice in heritage and sustainability: Between past and future: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesAxelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Degerman, E., Teitelbaum, S., Andersson, K., Elbakidze, M. & Drotz, M. K. (2013). Social and cultural sustainability: Criteria, indicators, verifier variables for measurement and maps for visualization to support planning. Ambio, 42(2), 215-228.
dc.relation.referencesBakri, A. F., Ibrahim, N., Ahmad, S. S. & Zaman, N. Q. (2015). Public Perception on the Cultural Significance of Heritage Buildings in Kuala Lumpur. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 294-302.
dc.relation.referencesBandarin, F. & Van Oers, R. (2014). Reconnecting the city: the historic urban landscape approach and the future of urban heritage: John Wiley & Sons.
dc.relation.referencesBitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57–71
dc.relation.referencesBossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: theory, method, applications.
dc.relation.referencesBorowiecki, K. J., Forbes, N. & Fresa, A. (2016). Cultural heritage in a changing world: Springer.
dc.relation.referencesBrown, J. and Meczynski, M. (2009), “Complexcities’: locational choices of creative knowledge workers”, Built Environment, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 238-52 (Chapain, C., Collinge, C., Lee, P. and Musterd, S. (Guest Eds), Hall, P. and Banister, D. (Eds), ¿Can We Plan the Creative Knowledge City? Alexandrine Press, Oxon).
dc.relation.referencesBrundtland, C. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our common future.
dc.relation.referencesBuchel, S. & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Citizens’ voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ecosystem Services, 12, 169-177.
dc.relation.referencesCarbone, L. P. & Haeckel, S. H. (1994). Engineering customer experiences. Marketing Management, 3(3), 8–19.
dc.relation.referencesCarrión, F. (2008). Centro histórico: la polisemia del espacio público. Centro-h (2), 89-96.
dc.relation.referencesCervelló-Royo, R., Garrido-Yserte, R. & del Río, B. (2012). An urban regeneration model in heritage areas in search of sustainable urban development and internal cohesion. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 44- 61.
dc.relation.referencesChi, C. G. Q., Cai, R. & Li, Y. (2017). Factors influencing residents’ subjective well-being at World Heritage Sites. Tourism Management, 63, 209-222.
dc.relation.referencesCondon, P. M. (2012). Design charrettes for sustainable communities: Island Press.
dc.relation.referencesCostello, A.B. y Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation Vol. 10 (7) disponible en: http://pareonline.net/genpare.asp?wh=0&abt=10
dc.relation.referencesCowell, B. (2004). Why heritage counts: researching the historic environment. Cultural Trends, 13(4), 23-39.
dc.relation.referencesCronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
dc.relation.referencesDessein, J., Soini, K., Fairclough, G., y Horlings, L. G. (2015). Culture in, for and As Sustainable Development; Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007 Investigating Cultural Sustainability: University of Jyväs- kylä.
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, P. & Fernández, P. (2001). Determinación del tamaño muestral para calcular la significación del coeficiente de correlación lineal. Metodología de la Investigación, 1(6).
dc.relation.referencesEdinburgh Council, Edinburgh World Heritage Site, His- toric Environment Scotland, Steering Group. (2011). The Old and New Towns of Edinburgh WHS management plan 2011-2016. Recuperado de: https://planningedinburgh.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/onte-consultation-july-2016-text-version.pdf
dc.relation.referencesGAD Cuenca. (1998) Propuesta de inscripción del Centro Histórico de Cuenca Ecuador en la lista de patrimonio mundial.
dc.relation.referencesGAD Cuenca. (2015b) Plan de movilidad y espacios públicos PMEP
dc.relation.referencesGrimwade, G., y Carter, B. (2000). Managing small heritage sites with interpretation and community involvement. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 6(1), 33-48.
dc.relation.referencesHair J, A., Tatham, R. & Black, W. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, Inc.
dc.relation.referencesHinton, P. R., McMurray, I., y Brownlow, C. (2004). SPSS explained. Routledge
dc.relation.referenceshttps://publicaciones.americana.edu.co/index.php/pensamientoamericano/article/view/312#:~:text=Iacono%2C%20V.%20L.%2C%20%26%20Brown%2C%20D.%20H.%20K.%20(2016).%20Beyond%20Binarism%3A%20Exploring%20a%20Model%20of%20Living%20Cultural%20Heritage%20for%20Dance.%20Dance%20Research%2C%2034(1)%2C%2084%2D105.
dc.relation.referencesIacono, V. L., & Brown, D. H. K. (2016). Beyond Binarism: Exploring a Model of Living Cultural Heritage for Dance. Dance Research, 34(1), 84-105.
dc.relation.referencesINEC. (2010) VII Censo de Población y VI de Vivienda del Ecuador. Recuperado de: ? www.inec.go.cr/sites/ default/f iles/documentos/anuario... /reanuarioes- tad2010-02.pdf >
dc.relation.referencesJeon, M. M., Kang, M. M. & Desmarais, E. (2016). Residents’ perceived quality of life in a cultural-heritage tourism destination. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(1), 105-123.
dc.relation.referencesJimura, T. (2011). The impact of world heritage site de- signation on local communities--A case study of Ogimachi, Shirakawa-mura, Japan. Tourism Management, 32(2), 288-296.
dc.relation.referencesKim, J. & Mueller, C. W. (1994). Factor Analysis, Statistical Methods and Practical Issues En Lewis-Beck, M. S. (Ed.) (1994). Factor Analysis and Related Techniques. London: Sage Publications, 75-155
dc.relation.referencesLandorf, C. (2009). Managing for sustainable tourism: a review of six cultural World Heritage Sites. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(1), 53-70.
dc.relation.referencesLandorf, C. (2011). Governance in historic urban environ- ments: A theoretical review. International Journal of Heritage and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 7-16.
dc.relation.referencesLawton, L. J. & Weaver, D. B. (2015). Using residents’ perceptions research to inform planning and management for sustainable tourism: A study of the Gold Coast Schoolies Week, a contentious tourism event. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(5), 660-682.
dc.relation.referencesLicciardi, G. & Amirtahmasebi, R. (2012). The economics of uniqueness: investing in historic city cores and cultural heritage assets for sustainable development: Washington, United States: World Bank Publications.
dc.relation.referencesLópez-Roldán, P. & Fachelli, S. (2015). Metodología de la investigación social cuantitativa. Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès): Dipòsit Digital de Documents, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
dc.relation.referencesMakuvaza, S. (Ed.). (2017). Aspects of Management Planning for Cultural World Heritage Sites: Principles, Approaches and Practices. Springer.
dc.relation.referencesTheory and Practice in Heritage and Sustainability: Between Past and Future, heritage reputation using citizen sensing. Habitat International, 45, 156-162.
dc.relation.referencesONU. (1992). Conferencia sobre el Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo (CNUMAD). Recuperado de: ?http://www.un.org/spanish/esa/sustdev/ agenda21/riode- claration.htm >
dc.relation.referencesPickard, R. (2013). Management of historic centres. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
dc.relation.referencesRamo, B. (2012). Merry Go Round; proposte per un manisfesto non troppo paradossale. Casabella, Italian review of architecture (No. 812, April. Milan, Mondadori), 56-73.
dc.relation.referencesRipp, M. & Rodwell, D. (2018). Governance in UNESCO World Heritage Sites: Reframing the Role of Management Plans as a Tool to Improve Community Engagement. In S. Makuvaza (Ed.), Aspects of Management Planning for Cultural World Heritage Sites: Principles, Approaches, and Practices (pp. 241-253). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
dc.relation.referencesMonteiro, V., Painho, M. & Vaz, E. (2015). Is heritage really important? A theoretical framework for Rodwell, D. (2007). Conservation: Background. Conservation and Sustainability in Historic Cities, 1-22.
dc.relation.referencesRotondo, F., Selicato, F., Marin, V. & Galdeano, J. L. (2016).Cultural Territorial Systems: Landscape and Cultural Heritage as a Key to Sustainable and Local Development in Eastern Europe: Springer.
dc.relation.referencesSoini, K. & Dessein, J. (2016). Culture-Sustainability Relation: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Sustainability, 8(2), 167.
dc.relation.referencesTajani, F. & Morano, P. (2016). A Systematic Analysis of Benefits and Costs of Projects for the Valorization of Cultural Heritage. In Cultural Territorial Systems (pp. 107-118). Springer, Cham.
dc.relation.referencesThrosby, D. (2017). Culturally sustainable development: theoretical concept or practical policy instrument?. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(2), 133- 147.
dc.relation.referencesTuan, T. H. & Navrud, S. (2008). Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage. Journal of cultural heritage, 9(3), 326-337.
dc.relation.referencesUNESCO. (2017). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, WHC.17/01. Recuperado de: ? https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/>
dc.relation.referencesWeiler, B. (2017). The future has other plans: planning holistically to conserve natural and cultural heritage.
dc.relation.referencesWu, S. R., Fan, P. & Chen, J. (2016). Incorporating culture into sustainable development: A cultural sustainability index framework for green buildings. Sustainable Development, 24(1), 64-76.
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcehttps://publicaciones.americana.edu.co/index.php/pensamientoamericano/article/view/312
dc.subject.unescoCiudadanía
dc.subject.unescogestión
dc.subject.unescometodología participativa
dc.subject.unescoPatrimonio Mundial
dc.titleLa percepción ciudadana sobre la sostenibilidad del patrimonio mundial. El caso del centro histórico de Santa Ana de Cuencaspa
dc.title.translatedCitizens' perception on World Heritage sustainability. The case of the historic centre of Santa Ana deCuenca
dc.title.translatedA percepção cidadã sobre a sustentabilidade do patrimônio mundial. O caso do centro histórico de Santa Ana de Cuenca
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Paquete original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
ojsadmin,+Art+5.+79-95.pdf
Tamaño:
2.22 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Paquete de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.48 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
CAA. Pensamiento Americano