Publicación:
Criticismo retórico: Teoría, aplicación y crítica

Página de artículo simple
dc.contributor.authorCardozo Mindiola, Cristian
dc.contributor.corporatenameSello editorial Coruniamericana
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T19:09:49Z
dc.date.available2022-10-14T19:09:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-14
dc.description.abstractEl presente artículo busca describir el enfoque hermenéutico conocido como “criticismo retorico”, analizar sus presuposiciones, aplicar el enfoque a la carta de Filemón y por ultimo of recer una crítica del enfoque. Este estudio muestra que el criticismo retorico resulta ser una herramienta útil para la hermenéutica literaria ya que en reacción a los movimientos que colocan el significado del texto en la comunidad que lo crea, el criticismo retorico busca determinar las intenciones del autor y los elementos que él usó para hacer persuasivo su discurso.spa
dc.description.abstractThis article seeks to describe the hermeneutical approach known as "rhetorical criticism", analyze its presuppositions, apply the approach to the letter of Philemon and finally offer a critique of the approach. This study shows that rhetorical criticism turns out to be a useful tool for literary hermeneutics since in reaction to the movements that place the meaning of the text in the community that creates it, the rhetorical criticism seeks to determine the intentions of the author and the elements that he used to make his speech persuasive.eng
dc.description.abstractO presente artigo busca descrever o enfoque hermenêutico conhecido como “criticismo retórico”, analisar suas pressuposições, aplicar o enfoque à carta de Filemon e por último oferecer uma crítica a esse enfoque. Este estudo mostra que o criticismo retórico resulta ser uma ferramenta útil para a hermenêutica literária já que está em reação aos movimentos que colocam o significado do texto na comunidade que o cria. O criticismo retórico busca determinar as intenções do autor e os elementos que ele usou para fazer persuasivo o seu discurso.por
dc.format.extent10 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationCardozo Mindiola, C. (2018). Criticismo reto?rico: teori?a, aplicacio?n y cri?tica. Pensamiento Americano, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v11i21-1.267
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v11i21-1.267
dc.identifier.eissn2745-1402
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universitaria Américana
dc.identifier.issn2027-2448
dc.identifier.reponameRIA - Repositorio Institucional Américana
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.americana.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.americana.edu.co/handle/001/360
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherPensamiento Americano
dc.publisher.placeBarranquilla, Colombia
dc.relation.citationendpage99
dc.relation.citationissue22
dc.relation.citationstartpage90
dc.relation.citationvolume11
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPensamiento Americano
dc.relation.referencesAristóteles & Racionero, Q. (2007). Retórica. Barcelona: RBA
dc.relation.referencesBaird, W. (2013). History of New Testament Research: Vol. 3 : From C.H. Dodd to Hans Dieter Betz (Vol. 3). Min-neapolis: Fortress Press
dc.relation.referencesBetz, H. D. (1975). The Literary Composition and Function of Paul’s Letter to the Galatians. New Testament Studies, 21, 353–379.
dc.relation.referencesBetz, H. D. (1979). Galatians: A Commentary on Paul’s Letter to the Churches in Galatia. Philadelphia: For-tress Press
dc.relation.referencesBruce, F. F. (1984). The Epistles to the Colossians, to Phile-mon, and to the Ephesians‎. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerd-mans Publishing Company.
dc.relation.referencesChurch, F. F. (1978). Rhetorical structure and design in Paul’s letter to Philemon. Harvard Theological Re-view, 71(2).
dc.relation.referencesDe vos, C. (2001). Once a slave, always a slave?: slavery, ma-numission and relational patterns in Paul’s letter to Philemon.. Journal for the Study of the New Testa-ment, 82, 89–105
dc.relation.referencesDunn, J. (1996). The Epistles to the Colossians and to Phi-lemon : A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company
dc.relation.referencesEire, A. L. (2001). Los fundamentos de la Retórica. Bahía Blanca, Bs. As: Universidad Nacional del Sur.
dc.relation.referencesFitzmyer, J. A. (2008). The Letter to Philemon: A New Translation With Introduction and Commentary. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
dc.relation.referencesJewett, R. (1986). The Thessalonian Correspondence: Pauline Rhetoric and Millenarian Piety. Philadel-phia: Fortress Press.
dc.relation.referencesKennedy, G. (1980). Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition f rom Ancient to Modern Ti-mes. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
dc.relation.referencesKennedy, G. (1984). New Testament Interpretation Throu-gh Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
dc.relation.referencesKennedy, G. (1997). The Genres of Rhetoric. En S. Porter (Ed.), Handbook Of Classical Rhetoric In The Helle-nistic Period, 330 B.C.-A.D. 400. Leiden: Brill
dc.relation.referencesKern, P. H. (1998). Rhetoric and Galatians: assessing an approach to Paul’s epistle. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLampe, P. & Sampley, P. (2010). Paul and Rhetoric. New York: T&T Clark.
dc.relation.referencesMack, B. L. (1990). Rhetoric and the New Testament. Min-neapolis: Fortress Press
dc.relation.referencesMelick, R. (2001). Philippians, Colissians, Philemon (Vol. 32). Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman
dc.relation.referencesMitchell, M. (1993). Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconcilia-tion: An Exegetical Investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians. Louisville, Ky: Westminster/John Knox Press.
dc.relation.referencesMoo, D. J. (2008). The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon, The Pillar New Testament commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
dc.relation.referencesPerelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhe-toric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press
dc.relation.referencesPorter, S. (1997). Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, 330 B.C.-A.D. 400. Leiden: Brill
dc.relation.referencesPorter, S., Porter, S., & Olbricht, T. (2001). The Theoretical Justification for Application of Rhetorical Categories to Pauline Epistolary Literature. En Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays f rom the1992 Heidelberg
dc.relation.referencesConference. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
dc.relation.referencesRobbins, V. (1996). Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press
dc.relation.referencesSanders, L. (2004). Equality and a request for the manu-mission of Onesimus. Restoration Quarterly, 46(2)
dc.relation.referencesVelardo, L. (2014). ¿Rétor o epistológrafo?: una reflexión sobre el análisis Retórico del epistolario paulino. Da-varLogos, XIII, 42–44
dc.relation.referencesWallace, D. B. (1996). Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan
dc.relation.referencesWalton, S. (1995). What has Aristotle to do with Paul? Rhetorical criticism and1 Thessalonians. Tyndale Bulletin, 46
dc.relation.referencesWatson, D., & Hauser, A. (1994). Rhetorical Criticism of the Bible: A Comprehensive Bibliography with Notes on History and Method. Leiden: Brill.
dc.relation.referencesWitherington, B. I. (2007). The Letters to Philemon, the Colossians, and the Ephesians : A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on the Captivity Epistles. Grand Ra-pids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company
dc.rightsTodos los derechos reservados Corporación Universitaria Americana. 2018spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcehttps://publicaciones.americana.edu.co/index.php/pensamientoamericano/article/view/267/336
dc.subject.armarcRetórica
dc.subject.armarcFilemón
dc.subject.armarcHermenéutica
dc.subject.armarcBiblia
dc.subject.armarcHistoria
dc.subject.armarcRhetoric
dc.subject.armarcPhilemon
dc.subject.armarcHermeneutics
dc.subject.armarcBible
dc.subject.armarcHistory
dc.titleCriticismo retórico: Teoría, aplicación y críticaspa
dc.title.translatedRhetorical criticism: Theory, Application and critics
dc.title.translatedCriticismo retórico: Teoria, aplicação e crítica
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Paquete original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
ojsadmin,+90-99.pdf
Tamaño:
513.88 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Paquete de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.48 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
CAA. Pensamiento Americano