Publicación:
Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results

dc.contributor.authorAlves Ribeiro Correia, Pedro Miguel
dc.contributor.authorAntas Videira, Susana
dc.contributor.authorDe Oliveira Mendes, Ireneu
dc.contributor.corporatenameSello editorial Coruniamericana
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T14:51:26Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T14:51:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-20
dc.description.abstractThis article is the continuation of a series of studies on the impact of the measures implemented by the Portuguese Ministry of Justice. This research addresses the results obtained in the civil enforcement actions arising from objectives included in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between Portugal and the so-called Troika (International Monetary Fund / European Commission / European Central Bank). The empirical study was extended to cover the quantitative analysis of the results achieved not only during the Troika period but also during the post-Troika period. The results show and confirm a continued positive effect on the level of civil enforcement actions in the period analyzed.eng
dc.description.abstractEste arti?culo es la continuidad de una serie de estudios sobre el impacto de las medidas implementadas por el Ministro de la Justicia Portuguesa. Esta investigacio?n se acerca a los resultados obtenidos en las medidas de ejecucio?n que salieron a la luz de los objetivos incluidos en el Memora?ndum de Entendimiento (MoU) firmado entre Portugal y la llamada Troika (Fondo Monetario Internacional/Comisio?n Europea/Banco Central Europeo). El estudio empi?rico fue ampliado para cubrir los ana?lisis cuantitativos de los resultados obtenidos no solamente durante la Troika, pero en el periodo post-Troika. Los resultados confirman la continuacio?n del efecto positivo en el nivel de las acciones de las medidas de ejecucio?n en el periodo analizado.spa
dc.format.extent13 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationAlves Ribeiro Correia, P. M. ., Videira, S. A. ., & de Oliveira Mendes, I. . (2019). Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results. Pensamiento Americano, 12(24), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.309
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v12i24.309
dc.identifier.eissn2745-1402
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universitaria Américana
dc.identifier.issn2027-2448
dc.identifier.reponameRIA - Repositorio Institucional Américana
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.americana.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.americana.edu.co/handle/001/317
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPensamiento Americano
dc.publisher.placeBarranquilla, Colombia
dc.relation.citationendpage53
dc.relation.citationissue24
dc.relation.citationstartpage40
dc.relation.citationvolume12
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPensamiento Americano
dc.relation.referencesAmbach, P., & Rackwitz, K. (2013). A Model of International Judicial Administration? The Evolution of Managerial Practices at the International Criminal Court. Law and Contemporary Problems, 76 (3-4), 119-161. Retrieved from: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4373&context=lcp
dc.relation.referencesBarnard, C. (1971). The Functions of the Executive: 30th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBell, J. (2006). Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, D. (2013). The Sky is Falling (Again): Evaluating the Current Crisis in the Judiciary. New England Law Review, 47, 571-603. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2515994
dc.relation.referencesCatarino, J., & Correia, P. (2016). Receitas Fiscais e Tributação Geral sobre o Consumo em Portugal: Um Estudo sobre Eventuais Assimetrias do Comporta- mento dos Sujeitos Passivos do Imposto no Final da Primeira Década do Século XXI. Revista da FAE, 19 (1), 6-17. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315772893_Receitas_Fiscais_e_Tributacao_Geral_sobre_o_Consumo_em_Portugal_Um_Estudo_sobre_Eventuais_Assimetrias_do_Comportamento_dos_Sujeitos_Passivos_do_Imposto_no_Final_da_Primeira_Decada_do_Seculo_XX
dc.relation.referencesCommission for the Efficiency of Justice (2016). European Judicial Systems – Edition 2016 (2014 data): Efficiency and Quality of Justice. Retrieved from Conselho da Europa: https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/evaluation/2016/publication/REV1/2016_1%20%20CEPEJ%20Study%2023%20
dc.relation.referencesCorreia, P. M., & Catarino, J. (2016). Ingreso Bruto Tributable del IVA: Evidencia de Diferenciación de los Municipios de la Costa Portuguesa. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 64, 225-246. Retrieved from: http://old.clad.org/portal/publicaciones-del-clad/revistacladreformademocracia/articulos/064febrero2016/grossrevenuefor-vat-tax-evidence-of-differentiation-at-the-portuguese-littoral-municipalities
dc.relation.referencesCorreia, P. M., & Jesus, I. (2016). Combate às Transferências Bancárias Ilegítimas pela Internet no Direito Português: Entre as Experiências Domésticas e Políticas Globais Concertadas. Revista Direito GV, 12 (2), 542-563. doi: 10.1590/2317-6172201622
dc.relation.referencesCorreia, P. M., & Videira, S. (2016). Troika’s Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment, Part II: Continued Positive Results for Civil Enforcement Actions in Troika's Aftermath. International Journal for Court Administration, 8 (1), 20-31. doi: 10.18352/ijca.215
dc.relation.referencesCorreia, P. M., Pinto, R., Garcia, B., & Dias, M. (2015). Teoria Institucional e o Poder dos Dirigentes dos Hospitais em Portugal, Parte III: Comparação com Outros Setores de Atividade. Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde, 7(3), 135-141. Retrieved f rom: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309410556_Teoria_Institucional_e_o_Poder_dos_Dirigentes_dos_Hospitais_em_Potugal_Parte_III_Comparacao_com_Outros_Setores_de_Atividade
dc.relation.referencesCorreia, P. M., & Dias, M. T. (2018). O poder detido pelos dirigentes máximos das organizações: evidências estatísticas de homogeneidade ao nível das perceções, em função da idade e antiguidade dos trabalhadores, em Portugal. Pensamiento Americano, 11(20), 80-92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21803%2Fpenamer.11.20.497
dc.relation.referencesDireção-Geral da Política de Justiça. (2016). Estatísticas da Justiça – Alguns Indicadores Estatísticos Sobre os Processos nos Tribunais Judiciais de 1a Instância, 2007-2015. Retrieved f rom Ministério da Justiça, Portugal: http://www.dgpj.mj.pt/sections/siej_pt/destaques4485/sections/siej_pt/destaques4485/algunsindicadores_2/downloadFile/file/Resultados%20 2015_20161028.pdf?nocache=1477659998.74
dc.relation.referencesFrederickson, H., Smith, K., Larimer, C., & Licari, M. (2012). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
dc.relation.referencesGomes, C. (2007). The Transformation of the Portuguese Judicial Organization: Between Efficiency and Democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 3 (1), 101-111. Retrieved from: https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.39/
dc.relation.referencesGuimarães, T., Correia, P., Bilhim, J., & Akutsu, L. (2015). Governança em Tribunais de Justiça de Portugal: Adaptação e Validação de Escala de Medida. Ciências e Políticas Públicas, 1 (1): 25-46. Retrieved from: http://capp.iscsp.ulisboa.pt/images/Ejournal/
dc.relation.referencesTroika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Results CPP%20Journal%20CAPP%20v1%20n1.pdf
dc.relation.referencesHayek, F. (1973). Law, Legislation and Liberty – Volume I: Rules and Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesHayek, F. (1978). Law, Legislation and Liberty – Volume II: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesHill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing Public Policy. London: Sage.
dc.relation.referencesKruskal, W., & Wallis, W. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47 (260), 583-621. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441.
dc.relation.referencesLane, J. (2000). New Public Management. London: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesLangbroek, P. (2008). Entre Responsabilisation et Indépendance des Magistrats: La Réorganisation du Système Judiciaire des Pays-Bas. Revue Française D’administration Publique, 125, 67-79. doi: 10.3917/rfap.125.0067
dc.relation.referencesMadureira, C. (2015). A reforma da Administração Pública Central no Portugal democrático: do período pórevolucionário à intervenção da troika. Revis- ta de Administração Pública, 49(3), 547-562. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612129503
dc.relation.referencesPortugal. (2011). Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/eu_borrower/mou/2011-05-18-mou-portugal_en.pdf
dc.relation.referencesRocha, F. & Stoleroff, A. (2014). The challenges of the crisis and the external intervention in Portugal. In Fundación 1o de Mayo (Ed.), The New EU Economic
dc.relation.referencesStephenson, M. (2004). Court of Public Opinion: Government Accountability and Judicial Independence. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 20 (2), 379-399. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewh038
dc.relation.referencesWalsh, B. (2008). Judicial Productivity in India. International Journal for Court Administration, 1 (1), 23-30. doi: 10.18352/ijca.123
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcehttps://publicaciones.americana.edu.co/index.php/pensamientoamericano/article/view/309
dc.subject.unescoTroika
dc.subject.unescoMemorandum of Understanding
dc.subject.unescoPortuguese Ministry of Justice
dc.subject.unescoCivil Enforcement Actions
dc.subject.unescoEvaluation of Public Policies
dc.titleTroika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice Experiment: Dissipation of Doubts about Success, Continuation and Confirmation of Positive Resultseng
dc.title.translatedEl Experimento del Ministro de la Justicia de Portugal con la Troika: Disipación de dudas sobre el suceso, continuación y confirmación de los resultados positivos
dc.title.translatedO Experimento do Ministro da Justiça Portuguesa com a Troika: Dissipação de dúvidas sobre o sucesso, continuação e confirmação dos resultados positivos
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
Archivos
Paquete original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
ojsadmin,+Art+2.+40-53.pdf
Tamaño:
1.54 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Paquete de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.48 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Descripción: